BRISTOL LAW REVIEW

  • Home

  • About

    • Partnerships
    • Sponsors
  • Print Edition

    • Past Issues
  • Online Edition

    • Essay Writing Competition
  • Editorial Board

  • Submissions

  • Contact

  • More

    Use tab to navigate through the menu items.

    ONLINE BLOG

    Our Recent Posts

    EEA Nationals are in an incomparable position to the Windrush Generation.

    How should the law respond to racial inequality? Choose one piece of enacted legislation, and discus

    'Leaving the European Union, the United Kingdom is attempting to "take back" a control

    Archive

    • November 2021
    • June 2021
    • April 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • June 2018
    • February 2018
    • June 2017
    • May 2017

    Tags

    • Costs
    • Defamation
    • Deterrence
    • International Law
    • Prison Abolition
    • Privacy
    • Racial Discrimination
    • Right Realism
    • Sentencing Act 2020
    • Slavery
    • Tort Law

    Want to be involved?

    Visit our submissions page to learn about how you can write for the online blog.

    'Leaving the European Union, the United Kingdom is attempting to "take back" a control
    Sean Sutherland
    • Apr 29, 2019

    'Leaving the European Union, the United Kingdom is attempting to "take back" a control

    The phrase ‘take back control’ has become synonymous with Brexit; a political event simply unparalleled in post-war British history. Yet behind this misleading simplistic phrase lies a much more nuanced, complex and (to a certain extent) unintelligible reality. This essay will seek to explain this complex reality of where power and control really lie. Firstly, it will address several unresolved tensions in the question: is control by ‘states’ ‘-and their citizens’ the same th
    Sophie Cashell
    • Apr 28, 2019

    ‘A comparative analysis of abortion regulation reveals widely divergent approaches across different

    INTRODUCTION Within the United States of America (‘U.S.’) and Germany, the regulation of abortion must adhere to their respective ‘constitutional values.’1 As such, the U.S. Supreme Court (‘SC’) and the German Federal Constitutional Court (‘FCC’), as the guardians of these values, have created frameworks in which abortion laws operate. Part I of this essay argues that the U.S. and German approaches to abortion regulation – as determined by their constitutional frameworks – ar

    ©2021 BRISTOL LAW REVIEW